"For 300 bucks there's nothing better."
Feature:
The big thing M-Audio touts about these monitors is their "tunability" to their surroundings.
There are 4 switches -
1) High contour - works great to raise or lower highs and minimize ear fatigue.
2) Mid contour - also great, kind of makes them sound more like Yamaha NS10Ms in the boost position but be careful you don't mix the mids right out of your project because of the boost.
3) LF cutoff - for use when you have a sub woofer, and
4) A switch that controls bass response when placed close to walls or in corners - kinda gimmicky and might not be useful. It really only dips the mids in relation to the bass because when placed near walls, theoretically, monitors become more bassy. Personally, I'd rather have the mids AND the extended bass rather than one or the other. If you understand how the monitors are coloring the sound, you'll be ok in compensating for it.
Quality:
So far, in the few months that I've had them, they're holding together well. No rattles developing or anything.
Value:
If there was an "11" I'd choose that. These monitors absolutely live up to the advertising hype.
Desirability:
Well, they're just monitors, y'know? If you don't have any you'll certainly lust after some but for the most part, they just sit there and work. Although, the little blue LED on the front looks cool.
Sound:
I can't say enough great things about the sound of these monitors. I only rated them "8" on sound though, because when compared with other monitors outside of their price range, there are certainly other makes to consider (The M-Audio BX8 being one...). However, for near-field monitors in the $300 range, these are absolutely the best for my ear and taste.
Specifically, the definition and "separate-ness" they give to all of the instruments in the mix is excellent when compared to other monitors in this price range.
I eval'd these against a bunch of others in the same price range including several different Events and Fostex PM0.5s. The Events - decent definition, no bass - kind of like loud Auratones. The Fostex - not as much definition, tons of bass. One other thing about the Fostex' though, they're loud as hell - reaching about 105db in the mid spectrum with pink noise as compared to the M-Audio's 90db in the same test. That brings me to the only minor beef I have with the BX5's - for normal mixing volumes, they're great, but for the times when you just want it loud, they might fall a bit short for some tastes.
Support:
Honestly, I only choose "10" on support because of what I've heard from others about M-Audio - supposedly excellent support. I've never had to use it though because I had no problems whatsoever with thses monitors.
Overall:
Overall, I'd say that I'm going to stay with these until they're dead and based on whatever else is out by then, I'll consider my options. If they were stolen tomorrow, I'd buy them again.
One thing to consider though, while these monitors don't really lack bass, they still cut off at 56Hz (they DO, after all, only have 5 inch woofers). The bass is "there" but you won't hit "the brown note" if you get my drift...
These days, most mixes of modern music go down into the 30s and that might be hard to do with these alone - kinda hit and miss, trial and error - record it here, play it there stuff.
The company recommends that you suppliment these with their SB8 sub woofer which I also tried and which was equally as great BUT it costs another $300. For that total outlay (about 6 - 700 with taxes), it might be better to simply buy a bigger set of monitors - there are lots of excellent choices in that price range - Alesis M1's for starters, or even the BX5's big brother the BX8. I can't comment too much on which way I'd go in that situation because I have been there and haven't had to think about it. The BX8's did sound great though - same definition as the BX5's but with way more bass (without the subwoofer).
Thanks for your vote. Can you specify what about this review did or did not help you?